CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SUNMED

USPTO serial 88498224

SUNMED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNMED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C BRANDON BROWNING

C BRANDON BROWNING MAYNARD COOPER & GALE PC1901 SIXTH AVENUE NORTHSUITE 1700BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin creams, lip balm, body oils, body lotion and cosmetic preparations for skin care, all containing CBD derived from hemp and less than 0.3% THC; all of the foregoing being non-medicated and none of the foregoing being promoted as a medicine or as a medical treatmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2026EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Aug 11, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 20, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 14, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 14, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 27, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance