USPTO serial 88564530
TARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Tingey
David B. Tingey Kirton McConkie36 S. State Street, Suite 1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software application for mobile devices to enable the provision of real-time translation services; downloadable software for creating indexes of information, indexes of web sites, and indexes of other information resources; downloadable software for mobile phones and mobile devices for detecting a user's location and displaying relevant local information of general interest; downloadable mobile application for language translation services; downloadable computer software for language translation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Translation services; outsource service provider in the field of translation services; providing on-line non-downloadable software for language translation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |