Drawing for ZOOBA

USPTO serial 88607028

ZOOBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLEY, EVELYN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOOBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin S. Cornuelle

Kristin S. Cornuelle ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Restaurant management for others, restaurant franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; and retail grocery store services; and grocery store accessories, gifts, sundries and promotional itemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 19, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 26, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2021INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 29, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance