Drawing for HUMAN INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 88621604

HUMAN INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HUMAN INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Lazouski

Alexander Lazouski LAZOUSKI IP LLCSUITE 1, 14726 BOWFIN TER.LAKEWOOD RANCH, FL 34202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer software for providing information in the field of well-being and science; downloadable mobile applications in relation to education for providing information in the field of well-being and science; downloadable mobile applications for the provision of news, articles and journals in relation to education, technology and science; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, magazines and newsletters in the field of well-being and science; downloadable podcasts in the nature of articles, magazines and newsletters in the field of well-being and science; all of the above excluding the field of businessACTIVE—
041publication services of magazines, books, newspapers; publishing of books and reviews; publication of magazines, books, newspapers; the provision of education in the nature of classes, seminars in the field of well-being and science and the provision of digital online publishing of articles and research findings via the internet; providing on-line electronic publications in the nature magazines, books, newspapers; production, presentation, provision and distribution of online journals in the nature of blogs, webinars, entertainment services in the nature of podcasts, vodcast in the nature of video podcasts, and news feeds in the nature of current event reporting, all in the field of well-being and science; provision of educational news and information in relation to the academic fields of science, technology and education; education services in the nature of classes, seminars in the field of well-being and science; provision of education and entertainment via podcasts in the field of well-being and science; provision of educational webinars in the field of well-being and science; educational services, in the nature of seminars in the field of well-being and science; events in the nature of educational exhibits and educational workshops in relation to technology, science and education; all of the above excluding the field of businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2022ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 2022PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 24, 2022FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Feb 18, 2022ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 16, 2022FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Feb 11, 2022ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 9, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 7, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance