USPTO serial 88636728
UNIFIED BIDDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIFIED BIDDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason B. Wacha
JASON B. WACHA WS LAW OFFICES751 LAUREL STREET #703SAN CARLOS, CA 94070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | In-application header bidding solution that may be accessed from a global computer network and which uses real-time pricing competition to provide publishers with maximum competition and better control over their inventory | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2019 |
| 035 | Advertising and marketing; business management; assistance in the promotion of good and services of others via targeted advertising, marketing, and soliciting; consultation in the field of online advertising, web, and mobile analytics; advertising analysis and optimization | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2019 |
| 042 | In-application header bidding solution that may be accessed from a global computer network and which uses real-time pricing competition to provide publishers with maximum competition and better control over their inventory, thereby allowing publishers to manage, monitor, and optimize the performance and effectiveness of websites, mobile applications, and online marketing campaigns; provide software for managing, collecting, integrating, reporting, analyzing, visualizing, indexing, filtering, and sharing a wide variety of data and information from various sources | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |