USPTO serial 88679333
WPOD WHOLE PRESSED ON DEMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLIOTT, LASHAWNDA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WPOD WHOLE PRESSED ON DEMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Stevens
David R. Stevens STEVENS LAW GROUP1754 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE STE 226SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Commercial appliances and kitchen appliances, namely, electric juice extractors, electric food grinders, electric food processors, electric dispensers and fillers for dispensing ground produce or juice into bottles or pouches or cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Prepared foods and frozen foods, namely, fruit pulp, vegetable pulp, fruit and vegetable pulp, frozen fruit and vegetable pulp; Processed fruit, vegetables, nuts for use in making beverages; Bagged cut fruits and vegetables, cut fruit and vegetables, frozen fruits and vegetables, processed fruits and vegetables for food purposes, sliced fruits and vegetables; Dairy substitutes, made primarily or derived from seeds, nuts, soy and/or other plants, namely, soy milk, almond milk, coconut milk, oat milk, rice milk, cashew milk, macadamia milk, quinoa milk, flax milk and whey milk; Non-dairy milk substitutes; Soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces; Cooking sauces; Dressing for salads; Processed herbs for use in making beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh, raw or unprocessed fruits, herbs, nuts and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juice bases; Fruit and vegetable juice base concentrates; Fruit and vegetable pulp bases and extracts for making beverages; Vegetable and fruit juice beverages; Juices, namely, fruit juices, vegetable juices, herbal juices, vegetable-fruit juices, fruit and vegetable juices containing herbal extracts, cold pressed fruit and vegetable juices; Juices prepared from fruit, vegetables, herbs or nuts; Juices prepared from a blend of fruit, vegetables, herbs and nuts; Fruit and vegetable juices containing herbal extracts; Fruit juice beverages that contain multi vitamins; Fruit juice concentrates; Fruit juice extracts being beverages or for making beverages; Vegetable juice concentrates being beverages; Vegetable juices being beverages; Coconut milk being beverages, namely, smoothies, coconut-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring juice, juice bases, juicing equipment, components for juicing equipment, fruit pulp, vegetable pulp, frozen fruit pulp, frozen vegetable pulp, prepared fruit, prepared vegetables, produce for juicers | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Juice bar services; Restaurant services; Café services; Bar services featuring juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Press LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Press LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named WPOD WHOLE PRESSED ON DEMAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |