Drawing for HEALTH IQ

USPTO serial 88694788

HEALTH IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTH IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARNER K WENG

GARNER K WENG HANSON BRIDGETT LLP425 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile apps for providing quizzes and self-assessment tools in the fields of health, healthy lifestyles, and longevity for use with customers of health insurance and in analyzing and evaluating insurance and Medicare needs; Downloadable mobile applications for providing self-assessment tools in the nature quizzes in the fields of health, healthy lifestyles, and longevity for use with customers of health insurance and in analyzing and evaluating insurance and Medicare needsACTIVEFeb 1, 2014
041Education services, namely, providing educational assessment services in the form of online quizzes in the fields of health, healthy lifestyles, and longevity for use with customers of health insurance and in analyzing and evaluating insurance and Medicare needs; Entertainment services, namely, arranging contests, and providing recognition and incentive programs designed to reward participants with knowledge in the fields of health, healthy lifestyles, and longevity for use with customers of health insurance and in analyzing and evaluating insurance and Medicare needsACTIVEFeb 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 23, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 5, 2023GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2023GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2023CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 3, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 8, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 7, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 31, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 28, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance