Drawing for I-N

USPTO serial 88696799

I-N

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-N?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth A. Schroeder Harper

Beth A. Schroeder Harper Siegel Brill, P.A.100 Washington Avenue S., Suite 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Snack bars consisting primarily of grains with fruit, nuts and organic flavoring; non-medicated lozenge candies and non-medicated herbal teasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2023EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2023EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 23, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 2, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 15, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 12, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance