Drawing for EDGECONNEX HYPERLOCAL TO HYPERSCALE DATA CENTERS

USPTO serial 88705186

EDGECONNEX HYPERLOCAL TO HYPERSCALE DATA CENTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDGECONNEX HYPERLOCAL TO HYPERSCALE DATA CENTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Davis

Brian M. Davis VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RD; SUITE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing third party access to Internet, network and telecommunications infrastructureACTIVE—
042Computer equipment co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of telecommunications network equipment and computer servers with the equipment of others and computer network co-hosting services; leasing of computer facilities; and leasing of web servers; technical support, namely, providing backup computer programs and facilities; computer systems analysis; computer systems maintenance, namely, maintenance of computer software; and technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems and help desk services; network systems monitoring; consulting services in the field of design, selection and implementation and use of telecommunications computer hardware and software systems for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance