CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IFG

USPTO serial 88711192

IFG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIFTU, BENIAM
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberlee A. Boyle

Kimberlee A. Boyle RICHARD LAW GROUP, INC.13355 Noel RoadSuite 1350Dallas, TX 75240

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031(Based on Intent to Use) Fresh fruits and vegetables; live plants; live trees; live grape vines; live plant material, namely, live grape vine material, live plant material and live tree materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 10, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 15, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 16, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 17, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance