Drawing for PACKAGECAM

USPTO serial 88789053

PACKAGECAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRELL, LUCY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKAGECAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle Trogden

Danielle Trogden THE BYFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC16165 North 83rd Avenue Suite 200Peoria, AZ 85382UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software for monitoring, tracking, and securing deliveries; downloadable computer software for tracking packages over computer networks, intranets, and the internet; package, shipping parcel, envelope, or other packages locating, tracking, and monitoring system comprised of audio-video recorders in the nature of sensors; downloadable computer software for tracking, monitoring, and sharing location of shipping parcels, boxes, envelopes, or containers; downloadable mobile application for monitoring, tracking, and reporting of locations of packages, envelopes, labels, and freight; electronic sensors or electric sensors for monitoring and/or measuring temperature, humidity, and pressure; electric or electronic sensors specifically adapted for monitoring and sensing motion, shocks, tampering, and movement; temperature sensors; pressure sensors; vibration sensors; motion sensors; motion recognizing sensorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 30, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 17, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2021PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 10, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 23, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 27, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 27, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance