USPTO serial 88805810
DIANXI XIAOGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIANXI XIAOGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sugar Land, TX
Sugar Land, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zheng "Andy" Liu
Zheng "Andy" Liu Aptum Law750 ALMA LANE#8244Foster City, CA 94404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Kitchen knife, knife sharpener, kitchen scissors, non-electric fruit peeler, non-electric can opener | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring jug, measuring spoon, measuring cup | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish not live, eggs, milk, and cheese; olive oil and coconut oils for food, processes potatoes and sweet potatoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BrandLab Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BrandLab Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DIANXI XIAOGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2021 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2021 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 14, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |