USPTO serial 88839467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda K. Greenspon
Amanda K. Greenspon Munck Wilson Mandala, LLPP.O. Drawer 800889Docket ClerkDallas, TX 75380| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Multifunctional and customizable manually operated hand pushed farming device, namely a mobile cart equipped with sensors and cameras that collect and provide information to a computer platform for the monitoring and assessment of the health of plants and crops | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |