Drawing for PLANT BASED MIRACLES

USPTO serial 88844360

PLANT BASED MIRACLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANT BASED MIRACLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George W. Lewis

George W. Lewis WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & SCOTT1250 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk; yoghurt; dairy substitutes, namely, artificial cream; dairy product substitutes being artificial cream; milk substitutes; milk substitutes containing oats, coconut, almond, soy, rice and hemp and other plant based ingredients; all made in whole of substantial part of plant based ingredientsACTIVE—
030Frozen yoghurt; yoghurt pudding desserts; ice cream desserts made from milk products; ice cream desserts made from milk substitutes; chilled dairy sorbet desserts; chilled ice cream desserts made from dairy substitutes; bakery desserts; ice cream; vegan ice cream; sorbets all made in whole or substantial part of plant based ingredientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2020AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2020PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance