USPTO serial 88886799
THE EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
Bryan K. Wheelock HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400ST. LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing behind the scenes access to factories and manufacturers in the nature of conducting guided tours of outdoor gear production factories and outdoor gear production facilities | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |