USPTO serial 88927171
HUBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUHN, RIO NICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen E. Kelly
Stephen E. Kelly HILL WARD HENDERSON, P.A.101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 3700TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Design of business processes for others, namely, raw transactional data processing services with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and personalized healthcare to patients; design of business processes for others, namely, raw transactional data processing services with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and custom development of smart city infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for processing raw transactional data with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and personalized healthcare to patients; Design of business process software for others, namely, design of data technology solutions in the nature of software and data processing programs for processing raw transactional data with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and personalized healthcare to patients; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for processing raw transactional data with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and custom development of smart city infrastructure; Design of business process software for others, namely, design of data technology solutions in the nature of software and data processing programs for processing raw transactional data with artificial intelligence for development of customized work queues, processes, service requests, and automated communication, all in the field of providing specialized, precision, and custom development of smart city infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |