USPTO serial 88952001
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Louisville, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE LAEMMLE WATTS
JULIE LAEMMLE WATTS WYATT TARRANT & COMBS LLP400 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 2000LOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring ENERGY DRINKS, PROTEIN SHAKES, AND DIETARY AND NUTRTIONAL SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS; Wholesale distributorships featuring ENERGY DRINKS, PROTEIN SHAKES, AND DIETARY AND NUTRTIONAL SUPPLEMENT PRODUCTS; Transportation logistics services, namely, arranging the transportation of dietary and nutritional products, energy drinks, protein shakes for others, expressly excluding any transportation services in the oil industry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 2, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |