USPTO serial 88975359
TEK BOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEK BOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FELIPE RUBIO
FELIPE RUBIO RUBIO & ASSOCIATES8950 SW 74TH CT SUITE 1804MIAMI, FL 33156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Adhesive tapes, other than stationery and not for medical or household purposes, namely, duct tape, strapping tape, masking tape, anti-slip tape, self-fusing tape | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |