USPTO serial 88977902
Serial No. 88977902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 88977902?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZHENG "ANDY" LIU
ZHENG "ANDY" LIU APTUM LAW1875 S GRANT STREETSUITE 520SAN MATEO, CA 94402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Staple food, namely, flour, pasta; coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack foods; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, frozen confectionery, confectionery made of sugar; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; savory sauces used as condiments; spices; and ice | ABANDONED | Dec 26, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |