USPTO serial 90013271
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South El Monte, CA
South El Monte, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEVASENA REDDY
1570 HERITAGE BAY DRIVESAN JOSE, CA 95138UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Anti-glare glasses; Breathing apparatus for underwater swimming; Cases for spectacles, for pince-nez and for contact lenses; Divers' masks; Diving suits; Ear plugs for divers; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglass frames; Goggles for sports; Nose clips for divers and swimmers; Pince-nez chains; Pince-nez cords; Pince-nez mountings; Protective face-shields for protective helmets; Protective helmets for sports; Riding helmets; Safety goggles; Spectacle cases; Spectacle frames; Spectacle lenses; Spectacles; Sunglasses; Workmen's protective face-shields | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 2020 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |