Drawing for SCREENING ROOM

USPTO serial 90020258

SCREENING ROOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCREENING ROOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE

KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST., SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing online non-downloadable software for accessing and streaming audiovisual and multimedia content via the internet, satellite and global communications networks; Providing online non-downloadable software for streaming audiovisual and multimedia content to mobile digital electronic devices; Providing online non-downloadable software for searching and organizing; Providing online non-downloadable software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices and for viewing, searching and playing audio, video, digital images, and other multimedia contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2023PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 2, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 5, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 5, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance