CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NAMSYS

USPTO serial 90149574

NAMSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, RAYMOND KANGMIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAMSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Gratz

Michael J. Gratz BOYLE FREDRICKSON, S.C.840 PLANKINTON AVE.MILWAUKEE, WI 53203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SaaS) in the fields of currency management, processing, and logistics featuring software for use in cash processing and logistics, monitoring of smart safe and cash recycler equipment, managing advanced credit for funds deposited in smart safes, tracking and tracing of cash in transit, managing fleets delivering cash, and facilitating the verification and fulfillment of cash in processing centersACTIVEDec 8, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2025ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 9, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 22, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 5, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 20, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 8, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 2, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 1, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance