USPTO serial 90158279
PHANTOM BEER COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, JEFFREY ALLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHANTOM BEER COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Melanson
Lisa M. Melanson MCCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP745 THURLOW STREETc/o SUITE 2400VANCOUVER, BC, V6E0C5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |