CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GROAI

USPTO serial 90207652

GROAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Richard Martin

C. Richard Martin MARTIN IP LAW GROUP, PC318 MAIN ST. STE. 503EVANSVILLE, IN 47708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for regulating the use of seeds, fertilizers, substrate and drain components contained in a plastic growing container for use in a hydroponic grow system for in-home use by individual consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring the growing environment for plants, including temperature, humidity, and water level used in conjunction with a growing apparatus loaded with plastic containers including seeds, fertilizers, substrate and drain components for use in a hydroponic grow system for in-home use by individual consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for more efficient application of fertilizers to optimize the growing performance of a plant for use in a hydroponic grow system for in-home use by individual consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for optimizing the performance of a plant through the monitoring and regulation of a controlled environment agricultural apparatus, namely a hydroponic grow system for in-home use by individual consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for optimizing the performance of a plant growth through the regulation of environmental control variables such as lighting and HVAC both inside and outside of a growing apparatus, namely a hydroponic grow system for in-home use by individual consumersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2021MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2021ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2021AORNASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP REVIEWED NOT UPDATED—
Dec 7, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 18, 2021EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance