USPTO serial 90373595
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Menlo Park, CA, US
Menlo Park, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA PIPER LLP (US)555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2933United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing private equity fund investment services; monetary services, namely, money lending; equity financing, namely, loan financing; equity capital investment; equity release services, namely, venture capital equity loans; investment raising of capital for others; venture capital fund management; financing of loans; arranging loans against security; financial leasing, namely, loan financing; financial analysis services; financial analysis services relating to investments; financial and investment consultancy services; financial evaluation and analysis of insurance and banking; financial management of companies; financial management advisory services; financial information and advisory services; commercial lending against security services; financial and monetary services, namely, providing private equity fund investment services; financial and funding services, namely, money lending; venture capital financing and venture capital fund management services, namely, providing financing and services to companies; information, advisory and services relating to the aforesaid services, namely, investment consultation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |