USPTO serial 90393686
ASSET INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASSET INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW T HARRY
ANDREW T HARRY XSENSUS LLP200 DAINGERFIELD ROAD, SUITE 201ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the curation, storage and analysis of information technologies, such as computer systems, virtual computer systems, computer applications, data and cloud environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services in the nature of curating, storing, and analyzing information related to the provision of data regarding technological assets, such as computer systems, user identities, computer applications, data and cloud environments, Computer services in the nature of curating, storing, and analyzing information relating to the provision of technology data, associated metadata and analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 2, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |