USPTO serial 90529017
THE WORLD'S DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2022
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with THE WORLD'S DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAITLIN R. BYCZKO
CAITLIN R. BYCZKO BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing co-location services for computer hardware, software, voice, video and data communications applications; electronic data transmissions; peering services in the nature of peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; computer network access services by means of an Ethernet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; computer services, namely, remote management of computer applications for others; computer project management service; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows companies to manage their digital infrastructure; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services featuring software that allows companies to manage their digital infrastructure, manage computer applications for others, and interconnect hybrid multicloud infrastructures; and consultation for the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2022 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |