Drawing for LEA NETWORKS

USPTO serial 90573339

LEA NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TARASCIO, MAUREEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEA NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Signal splitters for electronic apparatus, namely, digital subscriber line (xDSL) splitters; telephone connectors; Ethernet adapters; Power over Ethernet (PoE) network components in the nature of switches, splitters, midspans, and injectors; Ethernet switchesACTIVE—
042Design and development of digital subscriber line, coaxial cable and powerline communication networks systems; design and development of powering systems for telecommunication networks, power consumption monitoring and electrical vehicle charging; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring remote management computer software platforms for configuring, diagnosing and monitoring networking and powering equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2022ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 26, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance