USPTO serial 90619908
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEIYU BAO
18 LUARD ROAD, WAN CHAIUNIT D, 16/F, ONE CAPITAL PLACEHONG KONG, 999077| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Carpets; Anti-fatigue floor mat; Beach mats; Carpet tiles made of textiles; Carpet tiles for covering floors; Door mats; Door mats of textile; Floor coverings; Floor coverings made of rubber, plastic, textiles; Floor coverings of rubber and synthetic rubber; Floor mat systems comprised primarily of floor mats made of rubber, plastic, textiles; Floor mats for vehicles; Floor mats, fire-resistant, for fireplaces and barbecues; Foam mats for use on play area surfaces; Gymnasium exercise mats; Non-slip bathtub mats; Non-slip mats for baths; Rubber mats; Vinyl floor coverings; Vinyl floor mats for indoor use, outdoor use | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |