Drawing for PHOSPHORUS CYBERSECURITY

USPTO serial 90623824

PHOSPHORUS CYBERSECURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHONG, JESSICA EUNKYO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PHOSPHORUS CYBERSECURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joyce Liou

Joyce Liou Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software featuring cybersecurity software; downloadable computer software, namely, software for assessing organization risk within a business relating to cybersecurity threats; downloadable computer software, namely, software for detecting, assessing, and remediating vulnerabilities' to prevent Internet of Things (IoT) devices from launch network attacks and cybersecurity threats; downloadable computer software, namely, software for use in detecting expired firmware and software, and managing password and access credentials; none of the aforementioned goods being intended for devices using the Internet of Things (IoT) for quality control; none of the above products using artificial intelligence algorithmsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 25, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2024ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 28, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2024CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2024SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2024IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 2024EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 11, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 10, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 10, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2024NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 7, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2022CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2022APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 8, 2022EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance