USPTO serial 90624281
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seong-Cheol Son
Seong-Cheol Son VOYER LAW134 ABBOTT STREET, SUITE 403VANCOUVER, BC, V6B2K4CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software development of mobile applications; Computer software design; Computer programming and software design; Computer programming for others; Computer programming services; Computer programming consultancy; Computer software design and updating; Computer software design for others; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services relating to computer software; Creating of computer programs for others; Database design and development; Database development services; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of programs for computers and personal mobile devices; Design and writing of computer software; Developing computer software; Writing and updating computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |