Drawing for RAPIDEYE

USPTO serial 90802206

RAPIDEYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KETCHUM, BRENDAN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPIDEYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Orms

David Orms POLSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCPO BOX 1403BROOMFIELD, CO 80038-1403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Free Space Optical system in the nature of apparatus for transmission of data intended for Optical Inter Satellite LinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance