USPTO serial 90827071
PROVEUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROVEUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Ramon, CA
San Ramon, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David I. Greenbaum
David I. Greenbaum RIMON, P.C.420 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 101BBOISE, ID 83702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line, non-downloadable software for automated negotiation and agreement in the nature of amendment, modification, and conclusion of business contracts for others; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for automated negotiation and agreement in the nature of amendment, modification, and conclusion of personal agreements for others; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for automated negotiation and agreement in the nature of amendment, modification, and conclusion of relationship agreements for others; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for automated negotiation and agreement in the nature of amendment, modification, and conclusion of family agreements; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring cloud-based software for allowing users to manage negotiations of business agreements and personal agreements; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software for retrieving information from users engaged in business and personal agreements negotiation and delivering analytics and other information to aid in negotiations; providing temporary use of on-line, non- downloadable software for compiling and analyzing data and for the exchange of information in the field of automated negotiation and facilitating negotiation of business and personal agreements; providing on-line non-downloadable software for automated business and personal agreements negotiation and to enable users to engage in online alternative dispute resolution; providing a website that features technology that allows users to engage in automated negotiations and alternative dispute resolution online; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence for automated business and personal agreements negotiations and alternative dispute resolution; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring cloud-based software for allowing users to manage business and personal agreement negotiations; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software for transmitting information to a user from an adaptive, artificially intelligent software agent | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |