Drawing for TILE MASTER

USPTO serial 90851618

TILE MASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TILE MASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu

Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 WEST WARM SPRINGS ROAD SUITE 100HENDERSON, NV 89014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Downloadable cartoon strips; Downloadable computer screen saver software; Downloadable electronic game software; Downloadable electronic game software for cellular telephones; Downloadable electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Downloadable emoticons for mobile phones; Downloadable game software; Downloadable interactive game software; Downloadable mobile applications for downloading and reading electronic publications on portable electronic devices; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable virtual reality game software; the aforementioned excluding goods for instructional and entertainment purposes pertaining to the sport of golf and golf tournamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2023ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 9, 2023CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 2, 2022EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance