USPTO serial 90867322
DRF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seongnam-Si, KR
Seongnam-si, KR
Seongnam-Si, KR
Seongnam-si, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Siho (Scott) Yoo
Siho (Scott) Yoo Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP1279 Oakmead ParkwaySunnyvale, CA 94085United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rubber, plastic and non-metal goods, namely, door stops of rubber; rings of rubber for pipe fittings; rubber bottle stoppers; rubber packings for pipe fittings; water-tight rings, namely, rings of rubber for use as pipe connection seals; packing material for forming seals, namely, waterproof packings; soundproofing materials; pipe joints, not of metal; pipe couplings, not of metal; sealant compounds for joints; joint packings for pipes; plastic material in extruded form for use in production; junctions, not of metal, for pipes; reinforcing materials, not of metal, for pipes; pipe jackets, not of metal; pipe muffs, not of metal; joint packings for pipes; flexible plastic pipes for plumbing purposes and plastic tubes for water supply and sewer distribution; plastic rods and bars; plastic materials for packing; plastic plumbing hoses; flexible PVC pipes for plumbing purposes; PVC rods; flexible plastic conduits for plumbing purposes; flexible plastic pipes for plumbing purposes; plastic hoses for plumbing use; non-conducting materials in the form of pipe, namely, rubber pipes; PVC pipe joints; non-metal pipe couplings, namely, PVC dual sockets | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building and construction materials, namely, non-metallic rigid pipes for construction purposes; valves, not of metal or plastic, for water supply and drainage; gutter pipes, not of metal; refractory construction materials, not of metal; drain traps and valves, not of metal or plastic; non-metallic manhole covers; manhole covers not of metal; eave gutters, not of metal; drain pipes, not of metal; water outlet valves, not of metal or plastic, for water pipes; branching pipes, not of metal; water pipes, not of metal; water pipe valves, not of metal or plastic; penstock pipes, not of metal; underdrainage pipes, not of metal; roof gutters, not of metal; ducts, not of metal, for ventilating and air-conditioning installations; drainpipe for building, not of metal; plastic conduits for drainage; sewer pipes, not of metal; plastic gutter pipes; plastic pipes for plumbing purposes; rigid pipes, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jong Ho Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Hye Jung Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Jong Ho Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Hye Jung Lee
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named DRF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 14, 2026 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |