USPTO serial 90980155
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A GELLER
MICHAEL A GELLER DLA PIPER LLP USPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL, 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting interoperability standards and wireless communication standards; association services, namely, promoting the public interest and awareness of interoperability standards and wireless communication standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, conferences, seminars, classes, and training services in the fields of interoperability standards and wireless communication standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software for testing, certification of analytics of interoperability standards; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for testing, certification of analytics of wireless communications interoperability standards; technical consulting services in the fields of wireless communications interoperability standards, wireless standards and wireless communication; technical research and design services in the fields of wireless communications interoperability standards, wireless standards and wireless communication; technical research and design in the fields of consumer electronics, environmental controls, and remote monitoring of electronic products; technical analysis services in the field of wireless communications interoperability standards, wireless standards and wireless communication; providing a website featuring information in the fields of wireless communications interoperability standards, wireless standards and wireless communication; providing a website featuring information about wireless communications connectivity standards for members of an interoperability standards organization; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to coordinate connectivity and compatibility of wireless network-enabled products for members of an interoperability standards organization | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |