CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE TOP SHELF

USPTO serial 97044703

THE TOP SHELF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE TOP SHELF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin Charkow

Benjamin Charkow MASCHOFF BRENNAN15 W. 26TH STREET7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Bags with customizable dividers openable through use of a zipper or push button specially adapted for the storage of cameras and detachable camera lensesACTIVE—
022Mail bagsACTIVE—
028Cases specially adapted for fishing tackleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 17, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance