USPTO serial 97108999
PROCESS-BASED EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROCESS-BASED EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dripping Springs, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TICORA E. DAVIS
TICORA E. DAVIS THE CREATOR'S LAW FIRM1026 JAY STREET, SUITE B-116CHARLOTTE, NC 28208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of professional workshops in the field of experimental and nontraditional learning methods for sixth through twelfth grade students; Educating at senior high schools; Educational counseling services to assist students in planning and preparing for further education; Educational services in the nature of learning centers featuring instruction in the field of visual art and design, literature and humanities, mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics, human anatomy and physiology, social studies, theatre arts, world languages, technology and media, and music; Educational services, namely, conducting classroom instruction, training, mentoring, coaching, and tutoring in the field of visual art and design, literature and humanities, mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics, human anatomy and physiology, social studies, theatre arts, world languages, technology and media, and music and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for educators; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of individualized academics and self-guided instruction; Educational services, namely, offering of assessments and surveys in the field of educator training and performance for the purpose of improving teaching procedures; Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the sixth through twelfth grade level and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing a learning and innovation center featuring fully customized leadership, motivational, educational, and brainstorming training; Educational services, namely, teacher training related to methods of instruction that emphasize participation, effort, and initiative based learning provided on a real-time basis during classroom instruction; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers in the field of self and personal improvement; Leadership development training for educators; Providing after school educational programs for children in grades sixth through twelve; Providing information relating to education services for children; Providing information in the field of education; Teaching at junior high schools; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring personal and academic achievement for students in sixth through twelfth grade | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |