Drawing for CYBERCUPIDS

USPTO serial 97129064

CYBERCUPIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBIN, DAVID I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERCUPIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jesse Saivar

Jesse Saivar GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN & MACHTINGER LLP2049 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 2600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable electronic game software for use on personal computers, gaming systems, tablets, and mobile and cellular phones; downloadable graphic novels and comic books; downloadable digital and virtual goods for use by online avatars in the nature of downloadable computer software featuring virtual goods, namely, footwear, clothing, headwear, eyewear, bags, art, posters, decals, stickers, calendars, board games, toys, dolls, vehicles, and weapons for use by online avatars, virtual online environments; downloadable computer programs and computer software for electronic transfer of digital tokens; downloadable computer software for use as a digital token wallet; downloadable software for enabling users to electronically create, store, send, receive, accept, and transmit digital tokens based on blockchain technology; downloadable entertainment software for collection, distribution, and use of digital collectibles which have a permanent, identifiable record on the blockchain; downloadable mobile application for providing access to online digital collectibles and application tokensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance