Drawing for BYTECOIN

USPTO serial 97154359

BYTECOIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, JOANNA Y
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BYTECOIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adriano Pacifici

Adriano Pacifici INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTING, LLC400 POYDRAS STREETSUITE 1400NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Cryptocurrency exchange services; providing a digital currency or digital token in the nature of cryptocurrency exchange services for use by members of an on-line community via a global computer network; cryptocurrency exchange services, namely, digital currency or digital token incorporating cryptographic protocols used to operate and build applications and blockchains on a decentralized computer platform as a method of payment for goods and services; financial exchange of virtual currency; electronic transfer of virtual currenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2023PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance