Drawing for ECOBOT

USPTO serial 97196389

ECOBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G Shariff

Michael G Shariff INVENTA CAPITAL PLC40900 WOODWARD AVENUE SUITE 111BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Waste sorting machines; trash sorting machines; trash processing machines; raw materials recycling machines; waste recycling machines; trash recycling machines; waste crushing machines; trash crushing machines; raw materials compacting machines; waste compacting machines; trash compacting machines; raw materials destruction machines; waste destruction machines; trash destruction machinesACTIVE—
039Collection and transporting of raw materials, waste, trash, harmful substancesACTIVE—
040Sorting, processing and recycling of raw materials, waste, trash; information, advice and consultancy services relating to the sorting, processing and recycling of raw materials, waste, trash; compacting, crushing and destruction of raw materials, waste, trash; information, advice and consultancy services relating to the compacting, crushing and destruction of raw materials, waste, trashACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2025PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 15, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance