Drawing for CATINAPAY

USPTO serial 97198781

CATINAPAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATINAPAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard B. Biagi

Richard B. Biagi NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC2801 Lakeside Drive, Suite 201Bannockburn, IL 60015United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing electronic financial payment transaction processing services; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Payment processing services, namely, providing secure processing of payments in the nature of credit card and debit card transaction processing services on mobile devices, mobile phones, and held electronic devices, PC tablets, and computers; Providing an internet website portal in the field of financial transaction and payment processing services; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options via electronic communications networks, namely, using a mobile device as a point of sale over a global data network; Electronic payment verification service; Digital payment verification servicesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for electronic financial payment processing, for electronic payment services, and for digital payment processing services; Computer services in the nature of supporting mobile applications and customized web pages and other data feed formats featuring user-defined information in relation to electronic and digital verification and authorization services; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in processing electronic payments; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software and online services in the nature of computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the users to publish and share their text and images on-line allowing users to sign electronic documents; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software and online services in the nature of supporting mobile applications and customized web pages and other data feed formats for use in generating, obtaining, managing, capturing, storing, processing, and viewing electronic payment and electronic payment data; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows users to submit electronic invoicing and payment processing; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for electronic invoicing and payment processing; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in payment processing and electronic invoicing; Computer security services, namely, maintaining security and providing controlled access to electronically stored files and documents, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources based on assigned credentials; Application service provider (ASP) featuring application programming interface software for sending electronic payment requests, completing contracts, opening accounts, confirming deliveries, completing form documents, electronically signing documents, automating forms and form-field data, tracking documents in real-time, routing and controlling document workflow, configuring platform notifications, downloading digitally-sealed documents, and enforcing multi-factor authenticationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2026EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2025EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 9, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2025EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2025EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 8, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 1, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 10, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance