USPTO serial 97198781
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Greenville, SC, US
Greenville, SC, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard B. Biagi
Richard B. Biagi NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC2801 Lakeside Drive, Suite 201Bannockburn, IL 60015United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing electronic financial payment transaction processing services; Electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Payment processing services, namely, providing secure processing of payments in the nature of credit card and debit card transaction processing services on mobile devices, mobile phones, and held electronic devices, PC tablets, and computers; Providing an internet website portal in the field of financial transaction and payment processing services; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options via electronic communications networks, namely, using a mobile device as a point of sale over a global data network; Electronic payment verification service; Digital payment verification services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for electronic financial payment processing, for electronic payment services, and for digital payment processing services; Computer services in the nature of supporting mobile applications and customized web pages and other data feed formats featuring user-defined information in relation to electronic and digital verification and authorization services; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in processing electronic payments; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software and online services in the nature of computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the users to publish and share their text and images on-line allowing users to sign electronic documents; Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software and online services in the nature of supporting mobile applications and customized web pages and other data feed formats for use in generating, obtaining, managing, capturing, storing, processing, and viewing electronic payment and electronic payment data; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows users to submit electronic invoicing and payment processing; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for electronic invoicing and payment processing; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in payment processing and electronic invoicing; Computer security services, namely, maintaining security and providing controlled access to electronically stored files and documents, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources based on assigned credentials; Application service provider (ASP) featuring application programming interface software for sending electronic payment requests, completing contracts, opening accounts, confirming deliveries, completing form documents, electronically signing documents, automating forms and form-field data, tracking documents in real-time, routing and controlling document workflow, configuring platform notifications, downloading digitally-sealed documents, and enforcing multi-factor authentication | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |