USPTO serial 97269820
THRUFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THRUFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wallaceburg, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather Smith-Carra
Heather Smith-Carra BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.1100 13TH STREET NW, SUITE 1200SUITE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Use in Commerce) modular non-metal decking panels for construction of decks, docks, walkways, stairways, ramps and floor panel applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) retail store services featuring modular deck panels for decks, docks, walkways, stairways, and other flooring surface applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2026 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2024 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |