USPTO serial 97273730
MM MISH MASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLD, BARBARA NIELSEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MM MISH MASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW S RAPACKE
ANDREW S RAPACKE THE RAPACKE LAW GROUP PA3750 BIRCH TERRACEDAVIE, FL 33330UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic cigarette batteries; Batteries for electronic cigarettes; Battery chargers for electronic cigarettes; Chargers for electronic cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Electronic cigarette atomizers sold empty; Electronic cigarette boxes; Electronic cigarette cases; Electronic cigarette holders; Electronic cigarette lanyards; Electronic cigarette lighters; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; Electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smokers; Electronic cigarettes for use as an alternative to traditional cigarettes; Smokeless cigar vaporizer pipes; Smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipes; Smokeless tobacco; Boxes for electronic cigarettes and electronic cigarette accessories; Cartomizers, namely, combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; Cases for electronic cigarettes and electronic cigarette accessories; Electric cigarettes; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Smokers' articles, namely, outdoor cigar and cigarette disposal units; Smokers' mouthpieces for electronic cigarettes; Smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipes and pens being oral vaporizers for smokers for use with electronic cigarette cartridges comprised of cannabidiol (CBD) derived from Cannabis sativa L with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |