USPTO serial 97480391
WEEGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANCHEZ RIVERA, MARIA C.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEEGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 1250NEW YORK, NY 10165United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, entertainment services in the nature of ongoing television shows and webisodes in the field of children's entertainment; entertainment services in the nature of live meet-and greet performances by children's entertainment characters; entertainment in the form of television shows, namely, television news shows; providing online non-downloadable videos for entertainment purposes featuring children's entertainment via a website; providing non-downloadable digital images, short digital videos, music videos, short movies, television programs all for entertainment purposes featuring children's entertainment via a website; entertainment services in the nature of non-downloadable ongoing television shows featuring children's entertainment transmitted via the internet; educational and entertainment services, namely, providing on-line interactive children's stories; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, nondownloadable virtual content featuring images, animation, and videos featuring children's entertainment, for use online and in virtual environments; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing entertainment via podcasts in the field of children's entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing entertainment via ongoing webisodes featuring children's entertainment via a global computer network ; entertainment services, namely, providing entertainment via webcasts in the field of children's entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |