Drawing for CHEAT CODE

USPTO serial 97546404

CHEAT CODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUTCHISON, DAVID A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEAT CODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STACI R. DEREGNAUCOURT

101 N. MAIN STREETSUITE 525ANN ARBOR, MI 48104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003MascaraACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2024EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 25, 2024RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 3, 2024GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2024GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2024CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 6, 2023DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 4, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 4, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 18, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 18, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 27, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 7, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance