USPTO serial 97573221
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Spring Valley, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Kaplan
Joshua Kaplan KAPLAN LAW PRACTICE LLC350 W PASSAIC ST., SUITE 21ROCHELLE PARK, NJ 07662UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pince-nez; Lenses for sunglasses; Nose pads for eyewear; Corrective glasses; Eye glass cases; Eye glasses; Eyeglass lenses; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Frames for pince-nez; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Optical glasses; Reading glasses; Silicone nose pads for eyeglasses; Spectacle lenses; Sun glasses; Sunglass lenses | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2022 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |