CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for YOSHINO

USPTO serial 97670896

YOSHINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOSHINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. Andrew Kent

K. Andrew Kent RINCON VENTURE LAW GROUP2801 TOWNSGATE ROAD, SUITE 200WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Solar-powered electricity generators; electric motors for machines; electric motors for power tools; electrical water pumps used for draining pools, ponds, flooded land and building structures; power-operated tools for residential and commercial lawn, garden and landscaping uses, namely, leaf blowers; snow blowers; snow throwers; power-operated lawn and garden string trimmers; power-operated hedge trimmers; chain saws; power-operated lawn mowers; power-operated log splitters; power-operated tampers; power-operated plate compactors; high pressure washers; power-operated drill driversACTIVE—
009Cordless tool battery packsACTIVE—
012Motorcycles; dirt bikes; electric motorcycles; electric bicycles; UTV (utility terrain vehicles) and ATVs (all terrain vehicles); tractorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2026EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2025EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 8, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2025EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2025EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 22, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 29, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 28, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 22, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 22, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 31, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2023INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 31, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance