USPTO serial 97689853
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $450
Redwood City, CA, US
Redwood City, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis P. Cislak
Francis P. Cislak BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial robots; industrial robots used for physical manipulation in the field of logistics | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | downloadable computer software featuring algorithms used for packing, optimization, and human like decision making; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for controlling, scheduling, and managing robots; computer hardware; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence to automate tasks; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence to automatically build and deploy other software to manage robots and automate tasks; downloadable application development software and computer software for developing other software applications, all for use in managing, automating, and controlling intelligent robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing online non-downloadable computer software featuring algorithms used for packing, optimization, and human like decision making; providing online, non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for controlling, scheduling, and managing robots, including multi-robot collaboration; providing online, non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence to automate tasks; providing online, non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence to automatically build and deploy other software to manage robots and automate tasks; providing online, non-downloadable application development software and computer software for developing other software applications, all for use in managing, automating, and controlling intelligent robots | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |