USPTO serial 97907081
LABMATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LABMATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbia, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
Arlene D. Hanks MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 NORTH TRYON STREETSUITE 4700CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online, non-downloadable computer software for database management in the scientific, biomedical, and biological fields; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for clinical and translational data management; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for clinical trial monitoring; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for collection and harmonization of clinical, molecular, patient research and biospecimen data; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for reconciliation of clinical trial data; providing online, non-downloadable data management software for tracking reconciliation, summaries, projections, and consents of clinical trials; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for importation, exportation, integration and standardization, management, and searching of clinical trial data and operational biobanking workflows; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for monitoring the health of clinical trials from a sample-centric perspective across the distributed ecosystem of sites, labs, vendors, and biobanks; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for Clinical Trial Sample and Consent Tracking (CTST), namely, for comprehensive sample lifecycle support for in-study sample and sample consent management and tracking, including future-use virtual or physical biorepositories in the nature of next generation biobanking, and data mining; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for use as a virtual biorepository; providing online, non-downloadable computer software for use in managing a biorepository | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |